Allowed
Dr. Vijay S/O Radhakishan Varma v. Ekta Aabhushan, Proprietor Rajesh Ramchandra Atlani
Bombay HCAPPR/32/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appr32.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.32 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. OF 2014
(Dr. Vijay s/o Radhakisan Varma ..vs.. Ekta Aabhushan)
Shri S.G. Karmarkar, Advocate for the applicant, Shri Waquar Ahmed, Advocate for the non-applicant.
CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 06-05-2014
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Counsel for the non-applicant.
There is a delay of fifteen days in filing the revision application. The delay is not inordinate and this Court feels that the applicant shall get fair opportunity of placing his case before the Court on merits. The application is allowed. The delay is condoned.
The revision application be registered and be placed for admission after five weeks.
JUDGE
pma
Dr. Vijay s/o Radhakisan Varma
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court