Criminal application dismissed for want of prosecution as the notice to the non-applicant remained unserved after 25 listings, indicating lack of interest by the applicants in proceeding with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apl99.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.99 OF 2013
(C.D. Sortex and another ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra, through PSO of P.S. Gondia (Rural), District Gondia and another)
None for the applicants,
Shri R.S. Nayak, Addl.P.P. for non-applicant No.1/State.
CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 06-05-2014
None for the applicants.
The application is listed for twenty five times and still the notice to non-applicant No.2 is not served. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the application.
The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
pma
C.D. Sortex and another
The State of Maharashtra, through PSO of P.S. Gondia (Rural), District Gondia and another
M.L.TAHALIYANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
