Allowed intervention to allow an intervener to remain present through counsel and oppose bail grant. Disposed accordingly.
Allowed the intervenor to remain present through his counsel at the hearing of the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
tilak 1/1 (12)APPP-237-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.237 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.459 of 2014
Dattatray Ramesh Dikshit … Intervenor
In the matter between
Samadhan Rangnath More .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Pankaj Deokar for the Intervenor. Mr.Ajay Joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM : A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 9th JUNE, 2014.
P.C. :
2 Neither the learned APP, nor the learned counsel for the accused has any objection for intervention.
3 Application is allowed to the extent of permitting the intervenor to remain present through his counsel at the time of hearing of the Bail Application, and make submissions opposing the grant of bail. 4 Application is disposed of accordingly.
(A.M.THIPSAY, J)
Samadhan Rangnath More
The State of Maharashtra
Dattatray Ramesh Dikshit
A.M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
