The Criminal Application filed by Saikh Farzana Shaikh Jalal was withdrawn by her counsel on instructions. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application accordingly without issuing a substantive judgment on merits.
Criminal Application allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 927-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION 927 OF 2014
| Saikh Farzana Shaikh Jalal | ... | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | ... | Respondent |
Mr. Joyeep Chatterji for the applicant Mr. S. R. Palnitkar, APP for the respondent-State
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 25th February, 2014
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the applicant is heard extensively. He argued
on the ground of parity. When this Court expressed that it is not inclined to
grant bail, the learned counsel, on instructions, submitted that he wants to withdraw this application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
JPC
1/1
Saikh Farzana Shaikh Jalal
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
