The High Court allowed a bail application filed by Dilip Chudiwal in a case involving murder and theft. Despite antecedents, the Court found no strong evidence against him to warrant detention, ordering his release on bail.
Application allowed; applicant released on bail on furnishing PR and SB of Rs. 75,000/- with one solvent surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Application 414 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.414 of 2014
Dilip s/o Shivchand Chudiwal. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
Shri. K.N. Shermale, Advocate, for applicant.
Shri. S.R. Palnitkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 25th FEBRUARY 2014
ORDER:
2 Application 414 of 2014
registered for offences under sections 302, 201, 396 of the Indian Penal Code.
3 Application 414 of 2014
he received an amount of Rs.ten lakh as consideration for his help given to Munna. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are criminal antecedents against the applicant and proposal is made for filing charge sheet under section 3 of the MCOC Act against the applicant.
4 Application 414 of 2014
disposal of the case. He is behind the bars since 30-10-2013.
(T.V. NALAWADE, J.)
rsl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused in offences involving murder and theft.
Whether the prosecution showed sufficient evidence to justify keeping the applicant in custody pending charge sheet under MCOC Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dilip s/o Shivchand Chudiwal
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
