In a criminal application, the applicant sought liberty to withdraw. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn while granting the requested liberty.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to withdraw and liberty to approach appropriate authority upon filing of charge-sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
930 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 826 OF 2015
BHAUSAHEB S/O JAIRAM DEVRE & OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Chincholkar.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the application with further liberty to take appropriate remedy in the event of filing of charge sheet by the I.O.
2] Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
BHAUSAHEB S/O JAIRAM DEVRE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
