This High Court criminal application sought cancellation of pre-arrest bail. The court held the application infructuous as investigation was completed, a charge-sheet was filed, and the accused were enlarged on bail, dismissing the prayer accordingly.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47.appln389.14.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2014
Avinash Parshuram Jagtap. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents. ---
Mr. Rahul S. Kate, advocate for Applicant.
Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for State.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar i/b. MKS Legal Associates, advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : NOVEMBER 17, 2014
P.C.:
1 Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that before filing
this application seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail, the investigation was completed and charge-sheet was filed. The accused were arrested and enlarged on bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Hence, the prayer seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail has become infructuous. The application is dismissed as infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J)
Talwalkar
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail is infructuous due to completion of investigation and filing of charge-sheet.
Avinash Parshuram Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
