In a criminal application, the applicant wished to withdraw the plea. While allowing withdrawal, the High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the matter within three months due to the applicant's detention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 377 OF 2014
Sahebrao Uttam Gosavi
....Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent.
Mr. Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 17th February, 2014.
ORDER :
[ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail application can be withdrawn on instructions of counsel.
Whether directions can be issued to the Trial Court for expeditious disposal of the case.
Sahebrao Uttam Gosavi
The State of Maharashtra
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
