The court permitted the applicant's counsel to assist the A.P.P. during the hearing of the main criminal application. The present application was allowed and disposed of on those grounds.
The present application stands allowed and disposed of; applicant's counsel permitted to assist A.P.P. in main application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criapln2560-14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2560 OF 2014
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2336 OF 2014
(Anand Amarchandji Surana Vs. Prasanna Vinaykumar
Kothari and another)
Mr. B.R. Waramaa, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Mr. V.P. Kadam, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 30/07/2014
ORAL ORDER:
1.Heard.
2.For the reasons stated in the application, the
learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to assist
the learned A.P.P. during hearing of the main
application (Cri. Application No. 2336/2014). The
present application accordingly stands allowed and
disposed of.
[M.T. JOSHI]
JUDGE
npj/criapln2560-14
Anand Amarchandji Surana
Prasanna Vinaykumar Kothari
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court