High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, allowed a criminal application within a revision proceeding solely to condone the delay in filing and place the matter for admission.
Delay in filing the Criminal Revision Application was condoned; the application was placed on board for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Aurangabad
Criminal Application No. 6 of 2014 (In Criminal Revision Application Stamp No. 230 / 2013)
(Umakant s/o. Annasaheb Saindane / Thakur Vs.
Sangita w/o. Umakant Saindane / Thakur)
Appearances : Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. S.S. Panhale, Advocate, for the respondent.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY 2014
P.C. :
4. The Application disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
bgp/CrA6
Umakant s/o. Annasaheb Saindane / Thakur
Sangita w/o. Umakant Saindane / Thakur
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
