Nitin Kautik Choudhari and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed two criminal applications and disposed of a third, without substantive orders or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1778 OF 2014
(Nitin Kautik Choudhari and Anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.)
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3510 OF 2014
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| Mr. B.R. Kedar, Advocate for applicants. Mr. D.R. Kale, APP for State. Mr. Joydeep Chatterji h/f. Mr. D.K. Thote, Advocate for respondent No. 2. |
|
| CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 18th September, 2014. |
|
| PER COURT : | |
| 1. The application filed for assisting APP and | |
| another application filed for placing the Criminal | |
| Application No. 1594/2014 before the Court are allowed and disposed of. |
|
| [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/ |
Nitin Kautik Choudhari and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court