This was a listing in a criminal application. The applicant was absent despite prior adjournments. The court declined the request for an extension and dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crap1251.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1251 OF 2013 [Abdul Salim s/o Abdul Wahed vs The State of Mah. And anr.]
_________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders |
Shri A.R.Syed, advocate h/f Shri J.R.Syed, advocate for the applicant Shri G.R.Naik Thigale, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 Shri M.P.Kale, advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE, AND V.M.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 02.07.2014
PER COURT :-
1] Advocate on record for the applicant is absent. Even the counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 submits that on last 3-4 occasions the matter is adjourned.
2] Though there is request by the mentioning counsel for adjournment, adjournment declined.
3] Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
(V.M.DESHPANDE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
dbm/crap1251.13
Abdul Salim
The State of Mah.
S.S. SHINDE
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
