The High Court of Bombay allowed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 57-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court condoned the delay and admitted the appeal against conviction for offences under sections 395 and 450 of IPC.
Condonation of 57 days delay and admission of the criminal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.APPA859_2014.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 859 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO. 557 OF 2014
Vinayak Krishnat Sonawane … Applicant vs.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Jayant J. Bardeskar a/w. Mr. Amit B. Thorat, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the State.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 7th August, 2014.
P.C.
The Applicant/accused is convicted by the judgment and order dated 1st March, 2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the offences punishable under sections 395 and 450 of Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years and to pay fine, i/d. to suffer S.I. for six months under each count.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 57 days in filing criminal appeal against conviction requires condonation.
Whether the criminal appeal should be admitted after condoning the delay.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinayak Krishnat Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bharkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
