Applicant in criminal appeal convicted for murder of wife and daughter sought suspension of sentence and bail. High Court refused bail citing strong prima facie case and prior denial of bail, expediting appeal hearing.
Application for suspension of sentence and bail dismissed; hearing of appeal expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
appa-265-14
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 265 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1245 OF 2012
Pandit Kashinath Bhoye
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Z. M. Avhad for applicant. Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for State.
CORAM: P. V. HARDAS & A. S. GADKARI, JJ.
MARCH 25, 2014.
P.C.
No. 1245 of 2012 seeks suspension of the substantive sentence of imprisonment and his enlargement on bail, pending the decision of the appeal.
2
appa-265-14
Deceased Jayshree and Dhanshree had died due to strangulation and their dead bodies were found in the house of the accused. Additional circumstance against the applicant/accused was that the applicant/accused had not offered any explanation, but had taken a false plea of alibi, which the trial court rejected. The applicant was also not on bail during trial.
hearing of the appeal.
(A. S. GADKARI,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether suspension of imprisonment and bail should be granted during the pendency of the criminal appeal in murder case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pandit Kashinath Bhoye
The State of Maharashtra
P. V. Hardas
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
