The High Court allowed the State's application for leave to appeal against an acquittal by the trial court, as the impugned judgment involved significant findings requiring appellate scrutiny.
Criminal Application allowed; leave to appeal granted; bailable warrant directed to be issued due to delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
als-46-14
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra Vs.
Zahiruddin Abubakar Ansari and ors.
.. Applicant
.. Respondents
Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Sejpal for respondents.
CORAM: P. V. HARDAS & A. S. GADKARI, JJ.
MARCH 25, 2014.
P.C.
appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater
Bombay dated 25/11/2013 acquitting the respondents for offence punishable under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
2
als-46-14
court by issuing bailable warrant for Rs.10,000/- each against the respondents.
(A. S. GADKARI,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this jurisprudential record justifies granting leave to appeal against the acquittal order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Zahiruddin Abubakar Ansari and ors.
P. V. Hardas
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
