Dadaram Navnath Satav v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court rejected a bail application filed by a convict under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife. The court held that the case was not fit for bail, while expediting the hearing of his pending criminal appeal.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; hearing of criminal appeal expedited.
What the court decided
1 1.cri.appa.1209.14.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1209 OF 2014 IN
CRI. APPEAL NO. 737 OF 2014
Dadaram Navnath Satav .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte Advocate appointed for Applicant Smt. V.R. Bhonsale, A.P.P. for Respondent
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND SHRI.A.K.MENON, JJ.
DATED : DEC. 18, 2014
P.C.:
1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an applicant convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife.
How to balance the severity of the charge against the expediency of hearing the associated criminal appeal.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dadaram Navnath Satav
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
V.K. Tahilramani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court