Mr. Rupesh Harishchandra Tambe v. Mrs. Pratiksha Rupesh Tambe
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court rejected an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a family court decree nullifying a marriage. The delay was insufficiently explained.
What did the court decide?
Application for condonation of delay rejected; appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
1 fca445-14
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2014 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.31124 OF 2014
Rupesh Harishchandra Tambe
..Applicant.
V/s.
Pratiksha Rupesh Tambe
..Respondent.
Mr.Santosh S. Mahamuni for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND A.K. MENON, JJ.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause was made out for condoning a delay of two years and 157 days in filing an appeal.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rupesh Harishchandra Tambe
- respondent
Pratiksha Rupesh Tambe
Coram
V.K. Tahilramani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court