Allowed

Madan Ramesh Kalal and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC25 Sept 2014APL/741/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction considered an application to quash a criminal complaint filed under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC. The court allowed the quashing after being informed that the matter was amicably settled and maintenance had been paid.

What did the court decide?

Criminal complaint filed under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC quashed and application disposed of.

Madan Ramesh Kalal and Ors. Vs the State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

7-apl-741-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.741 OF 2014

¶4

Madan Ramesh Kalal
and Others...Applicants
vs.
The State of Maharashtra
and Another ...Respondents

¶5

Mr. Dilip Shukla i/b. Manas and Co., for the
Applicants.

¶6

Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State.

¶7

Mr. Tushar Bhosale, for Respondent No.2.

¶8

CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
 P.D. KODE JJ.

¶9

DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2014

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

.This is an application for quashing of

¶12

criminal complaint filed by respondent No.2 for the

¶13

offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 406

¶14

read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. Respondent No.2

¶15

is present in the Court. She has stated that she

¶16

has no objection if the complaint is quashed.
Parties have filed consent terms in the Sessions

1/2

Vishal Parekar

7-apl-741-2014

Court at the time when application for anticipatory
bail was filed by the applicant.

¶21

2.In view of the consent terms filed and the
matter has been amicably settled between the
parties, we are of the view that there is no
impediment in quashing the criminal complaint.
Application accordingly is allowed in terms of
prayer clause (a) and disposed of.

¶22

3.We are informed that the entire permanent
maintenance has been paid to respondent No.2.

¶23

2/2

¶24

Vishal Parekar

Madan Ramesh Kalal and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madan Ramesh Kalal and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sona Subhash Talera Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ranjit Prabhakar Palke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri Vile Parle Patidar Mandal Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Others

Sunanda Kulwant Sing and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Geeta Ajit Tiwade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Zakir Ansari and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.