The writ petitioner challenged an order of externment. The Bench observed that an effective remedy existed via appeal under the Bombay Police Act. Accordingly, the Court declined to entertain the writ petition, reserving the right to file an appeal. Petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(WP 3781 of 2014)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 3781 OF 2014
Ranjit Prabhakar Palke Vs.
...Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Sharad Rai i/b. ARM Legal for Petitioner Mrs. M.H. Mhatre-APP for the State
CORAM : V. M. KANADE , & P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2014
P.C. :
[P.D. KODE,J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise writ jurisdiction on the challenge to an order of externment when an efficacious appeal remedy exists under the Bombay Police Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjit Prabhakar Palke
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
P. D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
