Dismissed
Vijayanand Pandurang Ghadage v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPL/1172/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT 1/1 9 APL 117213
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1172 OF 2013
Vijayanand Pandurang Ghadage ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. U.B. Nighot i/by. Mr. Hamid D. Mulla, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the Respondent.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED: 7th January, 2014.
P.C.:
(V.L.ACHLIYA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to interfere with the proceeding.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijayanand Pandurang Ghadage
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court