4 During trial, seven prosecution witnesses were examined. Out of them important witnesses are P.W. 1, 2 and 4. P.W. 1 and 2 are injured themselves and P.W. 4 is their mother. Their substantive evidence was correctly examined by the Trial Court in the light of the Medical Officer of P.W. 7 Dr. Shirish Joshi. It is observed that the Trial Court had considered the answers given by P.W. 7 Dr. Joshi, during his cross-examination that the injuries sustained by P.W. 1 and 2 could have been possible by fall on the road and also fall on the hard and sharp object. Also it is seen that the Trial Court had critically examined mainly the substantive evidence of P.W. 4 Smt. Shevanta and entertained doubt as to why there was any occasion for her to leave the company of her son Chandrakant while proceeding towards the Police Station. According to this witness, on the way to the Police Station, she abandoned the company of her son Chandrakant and came back home and that time, she noticed the assault on her another son Shrikant. This substantive evidence of P.W. 4 Shevanta raised genuine doubt as to why there was occasion for her to come back, leaving her injured son while on the way to the Police Station. In the considered view of this Court, this evidence of P.W. 1, 2 and 4 has been rightly examined and raising doubt as to whether these witnesses are giving true and correct version of the events. This is more so in the light of the admitted position that there was a civil dispute between the three respondents on one side and P.W. 1 and 2
