Held that the appeal must be taken before the Sessions Court under Section 372. Allowed withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to prefer before the Sessions Court. Disposed on those terms.
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to prefer appeal before the concerned Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Waghmare
40.apeal.1233.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1233 OF 2013.
Umeshkumar Krishnaprasad Varmar
.. Appellant
Versus
Sanjivkumar Narendrakumar Kesari & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri Vikas Shivarkar for the Appellant. Shri Mahesh Thorat for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Smt. V.S. Mhaispurkar, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM :- A.R. JOSHI, J.
DATED :- 27th OCTOBER, 2014.
P.C. :-
1 After hearing learned counsel for the appellant- original complainant for some time it transpires that the present appeal is required to be taken before the concerned Sessions Court in view of the specific provisions of section 372 of Cr.P.C. It is further prayed that the present appellant may be allowed to withdraw the present Appeal with liberty to prefer appropriate Appeal before the concerned Sessions Court, in view of the provisions of Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as available under the law to the present appellant. As such, disposed of with liberty as prayed.
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present appeal required to be taken before the concerned Sessions Court under Section 372 of Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Umeshkumar Krishnaprasad Varmar
Sanjivkumar Narendrakumar Kesari & Ors.
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
