An appeal from order and civil application were withdrawn by the appellant. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the proceedings, directing the Trial Court to decide the Notice of Motion early.
Appeal from order and civil application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27 AO 476-14=.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 476 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 556 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Amerendra Mishra for the appellant.
Ms. Sumedha Rao for the respondent no.1
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 24/06/2014.
P.C.:
2 This Appeal from Order is preferred by original plaintiff against the order dated 06.03.2014 passed by Bombay City Civil Court, at Dindoshi, Mumbai refusing to grant ad-interim relief.
3 The learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw the present Appeal from Order as well as civil application.
6 This Court expect that the Trial Court should decide the Notice of Motion as early as possible.
1/1
Sneha Chavan
Original Plaintiff
Respondent no.1
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
