This order grants leave to appeal and admits appeals against acquittals in cheque dishonour cases where the respondent was absent. It directs initiation of process under Cr.P.C. 390.
Leave to appeal granted; appeals admitted; process under Section 390 Cr.P.C. initiated with directions to grant bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DeshmaneDeshmane
1
27.alp.11and12-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.11 OF 2014
(For Leave to Appeal) WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2014 (For Leave to Appeal)
Swastika Aluminium Architectural Systems ..Applicant Versus Shri Prashant Lokhande & Anr. ..Respondent
..Respondent
Mr.Kartik S. Garg, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State.
CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 28th OCTOBER, 2014
P.C.
1 / 2
Deshmane
2
27.alp.11and12-14.doc
coming to the conclusion as to acquittal of the respondent.
2 / 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted when the respondent failed to appear despite being served.
Whether the dismissal of cheque dishonour complaints due to improper filing warrants admission of appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Swastika Aluminium Architectural Systems
Shri Prashant Lokhande
A. R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
