Yogesh Sadashiv Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as the applicant instructed withdrawal of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
aba.994.2014.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.M.J. Bhatt i/b N.S. Bobade for Applicant Ms.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
the learned Counsel for the applicant/accused submits today that he has received a letter from the applicant instructing him to withdraw this anticipatory bail application as he does not wish to pursue it.
withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
vss 1 of 1
SHERLA V.
STATE
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court