The application for anticipatory bail was disposed of as infructuous since the applicant had already been released on regular bail, rendering no further consideration necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 ABA 764 OF 2014
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.764 OF 2014
Dhondappa Kundalik Sakhare .. Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. Sharad T. Bhosale i/by Mr. Jaydeep D. Mane, for the applicant. Smt. A.A. Mane, APP for the respondent State.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE : 19th August, 2014
P.C.
The learned counsel for the applicant
submits that applicant accused has been arrested and subsequently released on regular bail. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, this application becomes infructuous and therefore, disposed of accordingly.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Dhondappa Kundalik Sakhare
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhaskar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
