Application for anticipatory bail was disposed of by granting liberty to withdraw. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902.aba1245.14.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1245 OF 2014
Mrs. Vanitha F. Castelino. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent.
Mr. Ram Upadhya i/b. Law Competer Consultus, advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Vira Shinde, APP for State.
--- CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2014
P.C.:
1 Learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. The application is disposed of accordingly.
( SMT. SADH ANA S. JADHAV , J)
Talwalkar
1/1
Mrs. Vanitha F. Castelino
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
