The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of an anticipatory bail application by directing the applicant to approach the Sessions Court where his co-accused cases are pending and to apply for bail there, given the acquittal of co-accused.
The applicant was directed to appear before the Assistant Sessions Judge and apply for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
aba.1105.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1105 OF 2014
Bharat Namdev Patil
... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.V.V. Purwant for the Applicant Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP, for Respondent – State Mr.D.S. Chavan, Police Naik, Kurdwadi P.S. - present
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2014
P.C.:
1 / 2
aba.1105.2014.doc
learned Counsel for the applicant/accused has sought the protection of pre-arrest bail.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, who was absconding from charges under the Indian Penal Code and Mumbai Police Act where his co-accused were acquitted, should be granted anticipatory bail.
6 provisions across 2 enactments
Bharat Namdev Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
