Ramesh Bhagwan Madane v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Section 438 CrPC, the Court rejected the request for pre-arrest bail. The Court held that custodial interrogation was essential to investigate suspicions regarding the applicant's role in hiring assailants for an attack.
What did the court decide?
Pre-arrest bail application rejected.
What the court decided
22 ABA 1039 OF 2014
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1039 OF 2014.
Ramesh Bhgagwan Madane .. Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. Dhananjayrao D. Rananaware, for the Applicant.
Smt. A. A. Mane, APP for the respondent State.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE : 11th August, 2014
P.C.
Application is moved for pre-arrest
bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, as the applicant is prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 307, 341,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to the applicant accused in a case involving offences under Indian Penal Code Sections 307, 341, 326 and 120B.
Whether custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary in the prevailing circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ramesh Bhagwan Madane
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Mridulal Bhatkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court