High Court of Bombay civil suit dismissed because the plaintiff had no appearance. No relief granted for interlocutory measures remains valid.
Suit dismissed; interim/ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in interlocutory proceedings, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-S7682000.DOC
ars
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 768 of 2000
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Versus
B.D. Industries Ltd. & Ors.
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
Mr.B.G.Tangsali, for Defendant No. 1
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:June 13, 2014
PC:-
1.The names of the Plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears for the Plaintiffs when the matter is called
out. The suit is dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted
earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand
vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court