In Suit No. 564 of 2000 between Dresswala Fashions Pvt. Ltd. and Dena Bank, the plaintiffs were absent when called out. The court dismissed the suit under Order IX Rule 8 CPC and vacated any prior interim relief.
The suit is dismissed; any interim relief granted earlier is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-S5642000.DOC
ars
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 564 of 2000
Dresswala Fashions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Versus
Dena Bank & Ors.
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
Mr.Amol Joshi, i/b Poorvi Kamani, for Defendant Nos. 5 & 6
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: June 13, 2014
PC:-
1.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears for the Plaintiffs when the matter is called
out. The suit is dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted
earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand
vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a suit shall be dismissed for non-appearance of plaintiff.
Interim relief if any granted earlier in this suit shall stand vacated.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court