Dismissed
M/S.Ganga Developers. v. Cidco Ltd.
Bombay HCS/4933/1994
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Suit listed for directions in absence of plaintiffs. Dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 CPC. Any interim relief vacated.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 CPC; interim relief vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
908-S-4933-94.DOC
¶2
Shephali
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 4933 OF 1994
¶4
M/s. Ganga Developers.
Versus
¶5
CIDCO Limited.
¶6
…Plaintiffs
¶7
…Defendants
¶8
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
¶9
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: MARCH 5, 2014
¶10
PC:-
¶11
1.Today, the suit is listed on supplementary board, for
directions. None appears for the plaintiffs, although the appearance
of the advocate is shown and the name of the plaintiffs is called out.
Coram
AI extract
G. S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Pratibha Shipping Company Ltd., Cin NO.U35110MH1995PLC085742
Unitedspirits Ltd. and Anr. Vs Purfina Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Ors.
Shri Ramhari Devrao Ganage and Anr. Vs M/S. Ganage Stel Private Limited - U27109MH195PTC092794
Icici Bank Limited Vs Gol Offshore Limited