Dismissed

Indbank Merchant Banking Services Ltd. v. Pittie Cement Industries Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Jun 2014S/3374/1998

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Bombay dismissed Suit No. 3374 of 1998 instituted by Indbank Merchant Banking Services Ltd. versus Pittie Cement Industries Ltd. for non-appearance of the plaintiffs and their counsel when the matter was called out in court, invoking Order IX Rule 3 CPC.

What did the court decide?

Suit dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 CPC. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated.

Indbank Merchant Banking Services Ltd. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

13-S-3374-98.DOC

¶2

Shephali

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3374 OF 1998

¶4

Indbank Merchant Banking Services Ltd.
Versus

¶5

Pittie Cement Industries Ltd and others.

¶6

…Plaintiffs

¶7

…Defendants

¶8

None for the Plaintiffs.
 None for the Defendants.

¶9

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: June 17, 2014

¶10

PC:-

¶11

1.A notice has been issued on the printed board, as also on the
High Court Website, to the effect that, when a suit listed,
irrespective of the caption under which it appears, if none appears
for the plaintiff/s when the matter is called out, the suit will be
dismissed.

¶12

2.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is
dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any
interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.

¶13

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶14

1 of 1

Indbank Merchant Banking Services Ltd. v. Pittie Cement Industries Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indbank Merchant Banking Services Ltd. v. Pittie Cement Industries Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Agricultural Co. Op. Marketing Federationsof India Ltd. Vs Ansa Gida Urunleri Paz San Ve T.I.C. Ltd, Sti and Ors.

Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy Vs Rashid Sattar Oomerbhoy and Ors.

M/S.Vijay and Haresh Corpn. and Anr. Vs Ms.Veekaylal Investment Pvt.Ltd. and 8 Ors..

Morarjee Goculdas Spinning and Seaving Co.Ltd Vs Sree Kailash Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.

Mrs. Kamlesh Kumari Nigam Vs Rabinder Krishan Nigam and Ors.

Wipro Finance Ltd. Vs Chemox Securities Ltd.and Ors.