The court dismissed a suit for want of prosecution because no parties appeared when it was called for directions, and they did not appear again.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S 2935 of 1989 (902)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2935 OF 1989
Prafullata Gangadhar Sukhtankar and Anr. .....Plaintiffs Versus Naresh Chinthaman Athavale and Ors. .....Defendants
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 18th JANUARY 2014
P.C. :
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
