Disposed
Unichem Laboratories Ltd. v. Ipca Laboratories Ltd. and Anr.
Bombay HCS/2117/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
(903) IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S 2117 of 2010 (903)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2117 OF 2010
Unichem Laboratories Ltd. .....Plaintiff Versus Ipca Laboratories Ltd. and Anr. .....Defendants
Mr. Mahesh A. Mahadgut, for Plaintiff. Mr. G. Shah i/by M/s. Vimadlal and Co., for Defendant No.1. Mr. Ramesh Gajria i/by M/s. Gajria and Co., for Defendant No.2.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 20th JANUARY 2014
P.C. :
Terms be taken on record and the Suit be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the Vice President – Legal and Company Secretary of the Plaintiff, the Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary of Defendant No.1 and the Vice President – Legal and Company Secretary of Defendant No.2. The Consent Terms are also singed by the Advocates for the parties. The Suit is disposed of in terms of the
Consent Terms, marked 'X'. Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per rules.
1/2
ssp
S 2117 of 2010 (903)
documents to the Advocates for the Plaintiff upon the Advocates for the Plaintiff handing over photostat copies of the said compilation of documents duly certified as true copies.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
S.J.Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court