The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal of the plaintiffs' suit (Suit No. 2678 of 1995) in an ordinary original civil jurisdiction matter.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn; refund of court fee as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-S2678-95.DOC
Agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2678 OF 1995
Hindustan Lever Limited…Plaintiffs
Versus
M/s. Shivcharan Agarwal …Defendants
Mr. Vinayak Vengurlekar, i/by Crawford Bayley & Co., for the
Plaintiffs.
Mr. Mehul Shah, i/by Mr. A.G. Shah for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: March 10, 2014
PC:-
1. Learned advocate for the plaintiffs states that he has written instructions to withdraw the suit. The suit is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court fee, if any, as per Rules.
2. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Hindustan Lever Limited
M/s. Shivcharan Agarwal
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court