Raosaheb Changdeo Take and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Coram disposed of multiple writ and contempt petitions by relating them to a prior order in WP No.637/1997, directing discharge or rules to regulate.
What the court decided
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1766 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5666 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18435 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14031 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2001
(Yadav Kishanrao Raktate and others Vs.State)
Mr.A.D.Shinde, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent State. Mr.P.M.Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.9 and 10.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.696 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18440 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14029 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.696 OF 2001
(Kopargaon Sah.Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Kopargaon Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Mr.N.R.Bhavar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for respondent State. Mr.P.M.Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Yadav Kishanrao Raktate and others
- respondent
State
- petitioner
Kopargaon Sah.Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Kopargaon
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra and others
- petitioner
Village Panchayat Dauch (Bk.) Tq.Kopargaon
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court