The High Court of Judicature of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of five concatenated writ and civil petitions, including contempt petition, in view of a prior order passed on the same day in a related writ petition.
Rule accordingly discharged therein with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1766 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5666 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18435 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14031 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2001
(Yadav Kishanrao Raktate and others Vs.State)
Mr.A.D.Shinde, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent State. Mr.P.M.Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.9 and 10.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.696 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18440 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14029 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.696 OF 2001
(Kopargaon Sah.Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Kopargaon Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Mr.N.R.Bhavar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for respondent State. Mr.P.M.Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.962 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13897 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.962 OF 2002
(Village Panchayat Dauch (Bk.) Tq.Kopargaon Vs. The State of Maharashtra and other)
Mr.R.N.Dhorde h/f. Mr.R.L.Kute, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent/State.
( 2 )
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.969 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16092 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14030 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.969 OF 2002
(The State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Raosaheb Changdeo Teke and others)
Mr.N.R.Bhavar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for respondent State. Mr.P.B.Vikhe Patil, Advocate for respondent No.5 and 7.
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.110 OF 2003
(Navnath Kisan Shinde and others Vs. State and others)
Mr.N.V.Gaware, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent State.
( CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J. ) DATE 05/09/2013
PER COURT :
(RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.) ( B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
khs/Sept. 2013/wp485-01
Yadav Kishanrao Raktate and others
State
Kopargaon Sah.Sakhar Karkhana Limited
State of Maharashtra
Village Panchayat Dauch (Bk.)
State of Maharashtra
B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
