Writ petition dismissed as the matter attended by the Court was not dispatched to decided in time frame. No disposal or details of such disposal in the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp923-99.sxw
1/1
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.923 OF 1999
Popatlal Chunilal Gandhi …Petitioner versus 1.Shantaram Vaman Khamkar & Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP for State-Respondent no.2.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 23rd July, 2013
P.C. :
Counsel called, absent.
petition sine die as the matter before the learned Judge was to be decided in a time frame. Both the parties have not yet communicated the disposal or details of such disposal in the proceedings. The matter is not attended. Writ Petition is dismissed.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
Popatlal Chunilal Gandhi
Shantaram Vaman Khamkar
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
