Court permitted the applicant to withdraw the criminal application and disposed of the application.
Permission granted to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl-185-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 185 OF 2013
Punam Shekhar Malji .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Sachin Deokar i/b. Mr. V. V. Purwant, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Pednekar, A.P.P. for Respondent – State.
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : JULY 19, 2013.
P.C. :
Heard.
2 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission
to withdraw the application. Permitted. Criminal application is
dispose of.
(K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
1/1
Punam Shekhar Malji
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. Chandiwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
