Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn upon grant of liberty to file a fresh petition due to requirement for extensive amendment.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp882-13.order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 882 of 2013
Sulochanabai Shyamkisan Khulsunge and another.
Vs.
State of Mah. Through Talathi and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. K.R. Lule, counsel for petitioners.
Mr. K.L. Dharmadhikari, AGP for respondent nos. 1 & 2
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 14th February, 2013.
The learned counsel for the petitioners states that with the subsequent development the petition would require extensive amendment. According to the learned counsel, it would not be convenient to peruse the petition if it is extensively amended. The amendment would virtually run into several pages. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Permission and liberty both are granted as prayed for. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Sulochanabai Shyamkisan Khulsunge
State of Mah.
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
