The High Court of Judicature at Nagpur dismissed Writ Petition No. 828 of 2009 for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not interested in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp828-09.order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 828 of 2009
Lakhanlal J. Gupta.
Vs.
Ramesh S. Yadav.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 8 th February, 2013.
None for the petitioner. It appears on a perusal of the order sheet that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Lakhanlal J. Gupta
Ramesh S. Yadav
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
