This judgment disposes of a writ petition filed by a tenant challenging an order. The court found the petition infructuous as the petitioner had purchased the property from the respondent landlord, rendering the dispute moot. The writ is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1765-11.order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 1765 of 2011
Dr. Sharad Nandkishor Kabra
Vs.
Dr. Suresh Mulamchand Jain.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. A.C. Dharmadhikari, counsel for petitioner. Mr. H.R. Gadhia, counsel for respondent.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.
DATE : 8 th February, 2013.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a pursis to the court today. The same is signed by the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent. It is stated in the pursis that the petitioner-tenant has purchased the property from the respondent landlord and the cause of filing of the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made in the pursis and the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Dr. Sharad Nandkishor Kabra
Dr. Suresh Mulamchand Jain
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
