Dismissed
Sunil Prabhakarrao Mirkar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/7451/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp745113.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7451 OF 2013
Sunil s/o Prabhakarrao Mirkar and another
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. Anand V. Patil (Indrale), advocate for petitioners. Mr. S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1,3,4 & 5. Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.Pradeep Deshmukh, advocate for Respondent No.7. Mr.Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent No.8.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ. DATE :27th November, 2013.
PER COURT:
Since the process of election to the local body is set in motion, in view of bar contained in Article 243-ZG of the Constitution of India, the petition does not deserve consideration in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Writ Petition stands disposed of. The points agitated in this petition are kept open for consideration at an appropriate stage in appropriate proceedings.
A.I.S.CHEEMA R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
JUDGE
adb/wp745113
Sunil s/o Prabhakarrao Mirkar and another
The State of Maharashtra & others
R.M. Borde
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court