Criminal Writ Petition dismissed for non-appearance of petitioners despite notice on 12th June 2013. Respondent appeared; Petitioners were absent.
Petition dismissed for default of appearance by petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
48 wp.66.07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2007
SUDHAKAR GOVIND MOHITE AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Petitioners : None.
APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V.G.Shelke.
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. A.H.Kasliwal, Advocate h/f Mrs. Netrali G. Jain.
PER COURT:
. Nobody is present for the Petitioners. The record shows that nobody was turning up for the Petitioners and so, notice was issued on Court motion to the Petitioners. This notice was served, but the Petitioners have not turned up. On 12th June, 2013, it was made clear that if nobody turns up for the Petitioners, the matter will be dismissed.
2 Other side is present, but no one turns up for the Petitioners. Hence, the petition stands dismissed.
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ndm
Sudhakar Govind Mohite and Ors
The State of Maharashtra
Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
