In this criminal writ petition, the petitioner's counsel submitted a request to withdraw the petition on instruction. The court accepted the submission and disposed of the proceedings as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 371 OF 2013
(Bhanudas s/o. Uttam Vighne and Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. V.A. Dhakne, Advocate for petitioners. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 17th June, 2013. PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for petitioner, on instruction, submitted that he wants to withdraw the petition. So the proceeding is disposed of as withdrawn. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/
Bhanudas
Uttam
State of Maharashtra
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
