The High Court at Aurangabad granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-5883.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5883 OF 2013
Reema Hiralal Pol and othersPetitioners
versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.Respondents
Mr. Ravindra V. Gore, Advocate for Petitioners
Mr. R.P. Phatake, AGP, for Respondents No. 1 to 3
Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for Respondent No. 4
CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND
SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : JULY 24, 2013
ORDER
1.On the instructions from petitioner, the
learned Advocate seeks leave to withdraw the writ
petition.
2.Leave granted. Writ Petition is disposed of
as withdrawn. Learned Advocate for petitioner to
pay deficit court fees.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)(A.H. JOSHI, J.)
pnd
Reema Hiralal Pol
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court