Petitioner filed a writ petition. The Learned Additional General Public Prosecutor stated that the competent authority had taken cognizance of the matter. The petitioner was satisfied and sought withdrawal of the petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 411/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.411/2013
Shivdas Sambhaji Dhavale.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri Ajay Shinde, Advocate for petitioner.
Smt.V.A. Shinde, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 5.
.....
CORAM: A.H. JOSHI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE: 23.07.2013
ORDER :
1]Learned AGP states that the competent authority has
taken cognizance of the matter.
2]Learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the
petitioner is satisfied with this and prays for
withdrawal of the petition.
3]Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (A.H. JOSHI, J.)
ndk/c23713
Shivdas Sambhaji Dhavale
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court