Criminal Writ Petition disposed as withdrawn by the petitioner, who sought liberty to apply for set off under section 428 of Cr.P.C. Fees quantified for appointed counsel.
Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to apply for set off under section 428 of Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 21.3.cwp57.13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.57 OF 2013
[Sumit Ganpat Yadav .vs. The State of Maharashtra and one]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri Rahul Dhande, Advocate [Appointed] for the Petitioner, Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the Respondents-State.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 21, 2013.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the claim of the petitioner is u/s 428 of the Cr.P.C. but from the perusal of the reply, it appears that the same has been considered u/s 427 of the Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to make an application to the authority for set off u/s 428 of the Cr.P.C.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for.
Fees payable to the learned appointed counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner are quantified at Rs.750/-(Rs. Seven hundred fifty only).
JUDGE
JUDGE
Gulande
Sumit Ganpat Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Prasanna B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
