Criminal Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant with liberty to approach the High Court again.
Liberty to take recourse to the remedy available in law or to file a fresh petition before the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APL75.2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Application (APL) No. 75 of 2013
Vishal s/o Jawaharlal Dubey and another
vs.
State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Rajapeth, Amravati and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. M. Rai, Advocate for applicants
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 20, 2013.
Mr. M. Rai, the learned Counsel for the
applicants, seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty
to take recourse to the remedy available in law.
The application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE
Punde
Vishal s/o Jawaharlal Dubey
State of Maharashtra
B. R. GAVAI
PRASANNA B. VARALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
